Actinocyclus eos Kitton 1880, p. 91
‘Eös’
|
| Status | Invalid? | |
| Comments | See Rattray 1890, p. 204 (ref. 000784) for history of this anonymous note in Science Gossip , with reply from Kitton that he “certainly is not responsible for the sp. n.”. Rattray 1890 considered this species a "nomen nudum" and did not provide a description. [Kitton 1880 not seen by us] |
| Published in | Kitton, F. 1880 [ref. 000572]. The early history of the Diatomaceae. Hardwicke's Science-Gossip 16:77, 1 fig., etc. |
| Type | | Click here to view INA card. Click here to check this name in the INA website. |
| Collector | | Assessment of record accuracy | likely accurate |