Ditylum J.W. Bailey ex L.W. Bailey 1861, pg. 163 |
Generitype |
LT: Ditylum trigonum J.W. Bailey ex L.W. Bailey 1861 |
Designated by |
Boyer 1927 (000155), p. 117 |
Year Designated |
1927 |
Nomenclatural status |
valid |
Recent revisions |
von Stosch 1986 (ref. 006657) |
Comments |
Two species are originally included (D. trigonum, and D. inaequale) and no type is designated. Also described as new in Bailey 1862, pg. 332 (ref. 000125), with the same species included, and no type designated. Although the date "1862" is printed on the volume, ref. 007053 was published in September 1861 (according to current internet version of the ING, see ING entry for Ditylum). Althought the date "July 1861" is printed in footnotes of ref. 000125, actual publication date is 1862 (according to current version of the ING, see ING entry for Polymyxus). Boyer (1927), p. 117, gives for type D. intricatum (T. West) Grun. in Van Heurck 1881 indicating the synonymy of Triceratium intricatum West 1860 with D. trigonum J.W. Bailey ex L.W. Bailey 1861.Von Stosch 1986 (ref. 006657) incorrectly gives D. brightwellii as the type. Genus name sometimes misspelled Ditylium. |
Published in |
Bailey, L.W. 1861 (ref. 7053)
New species of microscopical organisms, chiefly from the River Para
Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, Vol:8, 162-169
|
Polymyxus J.W. Bailey ex L.W. Bailey 1861, pg. 165 |
Generitype |
T: Polymyxus coronalis L.W. Bailey 1861 |
Designated by |
Bailey, L.W.(000125) |
Year Designated |
1861 |
Nomenclatural status |
valid |
Recent revisions |
|
Comments |
Type by monotypy. Authorship in Farr et al. (1979) is L.W. Bailey, however, the authorship as shown above is more accurate. In this paper Loring W. Bailey published his father's (J.W. Bailey) notes, with some interpretation. Genus also described as new in Bailey 1862, p. 341 (ref. 000125). Although the date "1862" is printed on the volume, ref. 007053 was published in September 1861 (according to current internet version of the ING, see ING entry for Ditylum). Althought the date "July 1861" is printed in footnotes of ref. 000125, actual publication date is 1862 (according to current version of the ING, see ING entry for Polymyxus).Navarro & De Periborio (in Europ. J. Phycol. 28, 167-172. 1993), designated the lectotype for P. coronalis. |
Published in |
Bailey, L.W. 1861 (ref. 7053)
New species of microscopical organisms, chiefly from the River Para
Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, Vol:8, 162-169
|