Rhodeus Agassiz [L.] 1832:134 Masc. Cyprinus amarus Bloch 1782. Type by monotypy. Also in Agassiz 1835:37 [ref. 22]. Cyprinus amarus and two fossil species were mentioned in Agassiz 1832, but the fossil species were as name only; type is amarus by monotypy (only one available species included). •Valid as Rhodeus Agassiz 1832 -- (Wu 1964:200 [ref. 13503], Sawada in Masuda et al. 1984:55 [ref. 6441], Arai & Akai 1988:209 [ref. 6999], Chen & Li in Chu & Chen 1989:124 [ref. 13584], Kottelat 1989:11 [ref. 13605], Ye in Pan et al. 1991:124 [ref. 23876], Bogutskaya & Naseka 1996:32 [ref. 22798], Doi 1997:24 [ref. 22832], Lin in Chen et al. 1998:444 [ref. 23878], Holčík 1999:1 [ref. 24847], Hänfling & Brandl 2000:267 [ref. 25144], Arai et al. 2001:275 [ref. 25545], Bogutskaya & Naseka 2004:43 [ref. 28183], Chen et al. 2005:90 [ref. 28516], Kottelat & Freyhof 2007:82 [ref. 29996], Yang et al. 2010:333 [ref. 30786], Li & Arai 2010:303 [ref. 31188], Kottelat 2013:157 [ref. 32989], Li & Arai 2014:165 [ref. 33267], Parin et al. 2014:87 [ref. 33547], Jouladeh-Roudbar et al. 2015:879 [ref. 34062], Zhang et al. 2016:68 [ref. 34477] dated 1835, Dyldin & Orlov 2016:662 [ref. 34853], Esmaeili et al. 2017:55 [ref. 35254], Esmaeili et al. 2018:34 [ref. 36089], Li et al. 2020:[1] [ref. 37372], Li et al. 2020:329 [ref. 37574], Esmaeili et al. 2020:319 [ref. 37759]). Current status: Valid as Rhodeus Agassiz 1832. Acheilognathidae.