Batasio Blyth [E.] 1860:149 Masc. Batasio buchanani Blyth 1860 (= Pimelodus batasio Hamilton 1822). Type by original designation. Type designated as "B. Buchanani, nobis; Pimelodus batasio, B.H." Blyth needlessly renamed batasio as buchanani. Gender uncertain, treated as masculine by current authors. •Valid as Batasio Blyth 1860 -- (Jayaram 1977:16 [ref. 7005], Jayaram 1977 [ref. 7007], Jayaram 1981:190 [ref. 6497], Burgess 1989:70 [ref. 12860], Kottelat 1989:13 [ref. 13605], Ataur Rahman 1989:192 [ref. 24860], Mo 1991:141 [ref. 19952], Ng & Kottelat 2001:495 [ref. 25746], Ataur Rahman 2003:213 [ref. 31338], Ng 2004:67 [ref. 27646], Ng & Edds 2004:295 [ref. 27993], Vishwanath & Darshan 2006:2160 [ref. 28454], Ng 2006:101 [ref. 28588], Jayaram 2006:78 [ref. 28762], Arunachalam & Muralidharan 2007:1680 [ref. 29123], Ferraris 2007:84 [ref. 29155], Ng & Kottelat 2008:289 [ref. 29391], Ng 2008:1 [ref. 29713], Ng 2009:253 [ref. 30216], Darshan et al. 2011:52 [ref. 31332], Kottelat 2013:257 [ref. 32989]). Current status: Valid as Batasio Blyth 1860. Bagridae.